Wednesday 4th February 2009
I
will begin with the closing point of the Minister of
State. We need an election because the current
Government has no mandate for what it is doing. The
notion that any democrat would regard seeking the view
of the people and the endorsement of the people for such
a policy platform as some sort of diversion is somebody
who does not understand the meaning of a democratic
mandate. We are in a catastrophic economic situation.
Everybody in this House knows that and the people know
it.
The
Government wants to couch our economic catastrophe in
some sort of world vision that it is not our own doing
or the doings of this Government, but that somehow it is
somebody else’s fault. However, largely our problems
have been caused by a Government that changed an
export-driven, job-focused economy in 2001 into a
speculation economy, driven by speculation in land and
property prices, coaxed on by the friends of Fianna Fáil
and allowing windfall profits of unimaginable sums to be
given to some small cohort of individuals in the State.
The
economic commentariat, who were among the cheerleaders
for that economic policy of property speculation, have
managed in the last short while to switch the focus away
from those who caused our economic woes onto those who
certainly did not and that is the public sector who are
in no way responsible for our economic situation. There
is palpable anger among all public servants who are
enraged not only at the scale of the financial
imposition upon them but also by the way their service
has been devalued and dismissed. They are being
characterised by some as, “drones dragging down our
economy” and it is a disgrace that this would be the
case. The divisions being stoked between public and
private workers is a hornet’s nest that will do great
damage to the country.
In
the minute or two of my time I want to talk, not about
the economic plan presented to us, because we have no
economic plan, but about the levy which is not, as has
been characterised, a pensions levy but rather a pay
levy on one sector of the economy, the public sector. I
have spoken to dozens of people today. Some are really
dismayed. A part-time cleaner in the public service
earning €17,000 a year will be required to pay €510,
one and a half week’s wages, out of her miserable
wage.
That
is not fair, not equitable and not acceptable. The levy
is not pension-related. Gross income is to be tabulated
into the levy. Overtime, premium payments, payments that
are not calculated for pension purposes, should not
therefore be encompassed by the levy.
The
Minister for Defence was unable to answer a simple
question at Question Time as to whether, for example,
overseas military service allowance was to be included.
Will the allowance paid to our soldiers in
Chad
be included? The Minister for Defence does not know.
That is how well thought out this income levy dressed up
as a pensions levy is. It is a crude and unfair system.
It is clear, however, that the public pay bill must be
addressed. It can be addressed in a fair way but the
Government has not gone about doing it in this measure.
In
the time remaining I want to deal with one other issue,
that is, the assault on overseas development aid. I say
this as someone who worked for some time in a voluntary
capacity in
Africa
. It is dishonourable that solemn commitments twice
given to increase our overseas development aid budget
incrementally over time are to be among the first
casualties. The poorest of the poor, those who literally
cannot feed themselves, are to be casualties of the
cuts. That is reprehensible and disgraceful.
I
ask the Government to forge a consensus of social
solidarity to address in an effective way the serious
problems that face us. The Labour Party will assist in
this, but the division of society between public and
private workers and the characterisation of some as
drones will be a disastrous way to set about it. That is
what has happened on the part of the Government to date.